NT $39,000 is not just a randomly shouted psychological price, but a GEO consultant team that's going to do everything in 30 days, counting the numbers that come out after hours. Most of the agents refused to publish the audit price because their prices were based on incorrect information; we put it under the sun because GEO was supposed to sell it in a verifiable way.
Let's start with the conclusion: this money is for judgment, not for reporting.
A GEO audit was finally handed over to you by a couple of pages plus a meeting. Looks like the content, but what you really pay for is judgment -- judging your brand. Quoted in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews or skipped, the gap was determined in content structure, physical authority or technical repugnantness, and which of the three pre-formations could pull up visibility in the shortest possible time. This determination comes from the actual performance of the B2B SaaS site in the AI engine that has been seen enough. The report is just a determination.
If you divide the NT $39,000 by 30 days, about $1,300 a day. This number is lower than the one-day journey of a senior SEO consultant in Taipei. The difference is that we use a systematic process and a self-building tool to compress the double labor pressure and put the time saved back on the issue of "see what your data stands for."
NT $39,000.
Transparent pricing means that I'd like to tell you about the distribution of these 30 days. The following four pieces each respond to real human investment, not marketing.
- Visibility of base-line measurements: Using Brand Radar on multiple AI engines, for real questions about dozens of groups of your type, record whether your brand is mentioned, the source of the quoted content, and the share of the competition. This piece accounts for about 30% of the total hours of work because of the need to create a rematched query collection instead of asking questions.
- Technical readability check: Is AI reptiles able to read your content clean, about robots rules, structure data, whether the content is hidden in blocks that require JavaScript rendering? We'll actually model the engine, not just Google Search Console.
- Content and physical authority diagnosis: Did your page answer the question in a "extractable" way? This determines whether AI will consider you a credible source.
- Precedient sequence road map and delivery meeting: Shape all the findings into a list of 30, 60, 90 days of action, and use a meeting to make the logic clear so that your team knows why.
It's often not the problem that takes the most time in four pieces, but sort of. Any site can list 50 to-dos, and the real value is to tell you which five to do first and why the remaining 45 to leave.
Why don't you use "recognizing" or free? Nuclear
There are two commonly seen alternatives at the market, and we have no intention of doing so for a reason.
Free audits are almost all packaged sales briefs. Its purpose is to create anxiety and push you to sign a treaty, not to give you a list that can be implemented independently. It's gonna cost you to run the engine, the query collection, the physical signals. For 10 hours, no one would be doing these jobs for nothing without trying to get the cost back from elsewhere — usually from the price of the subsequent contract. You think you're saving the audit fee, but you're paying where you can't see it.
It's an honest audit that you pay, you take it and you can do it yourself and even go to another house. It dares you to take it away, which means it has faith in the content.
As for "benefits by results", it sounds beneficial to the client and actually distorts the motivation of the consultant. GEO’s visibility is influenced by many factors, such as algorithm adjustments, competing opponent moves, and your own speed of writing, and tying the consultant’s remuneration to short-term rankings will only induce each other to pursue easy-to-exceed vanity indicators, rather than helping you to build a long-term physical power base. A fixed and transparent audit would allow us to say honestly, "Don't do it now."
The position determination behind this price.
NT $39,000 fell in a deliberately chosen position: tall enough to wipe out people who just wanted to get a free briefing, low enough to get a serious B2B SaaS willing to use it for a decision experiment. It's not an entry point, it's not a six-digit business year. It's a "test and expand" doorway.
We designed the audit to be a stand-alone deliverable, not a kidnapping foreplay. When you're done with the audit, you can do it yourself, find a team to do it, or give us the GEO content engine. We're all on the three tracks because if the auditors themselves can't afford the money, there's no one left behind. The bottom line of price-fixing is clear, and it's the product itself.
What will you get, what won't you get?
will get: a cross-engine visual base number, a list of technical questions specific to the page level, an analysis of physical power gaps, and a prioritized road map. Not going to get it: an empty "overwrite quality" proposal, a generic report copied from a public version of the template, or a noun for watering out pages. The audit's value density is the reason we're making a public offer.
How do you figure this money is gonna work for you?
A simple algorithm: If your product is in the order of hundreds of thousands of yuan a year or more, it's back to the book as long as this audit helps you win an additional client that would have been stopped in the AI response. GEO's shadow itself, and after the audit you don't walk the curve -- you don't spend six months writing a bunch of AIs that you wouldn't even quote.
Instead, it says that if you haven't got a steady product, and the official web content is just getting started, then you're not gonna need the GEO audit, but you're gonna have to fix the basics. We'll just tell you not to spend the money. Discouraging inappropriate clients is also part of transparent pricing.
Want to know how big the real gap your brand is in the AI engine, you can pre-schedule a 30-minute GEO diagnosis, and we'll show you the difference before you decide whether to do a full audit.
