Building the prompt map
Starting from your ICP, sales conversations and competitive positioning, we build 1,000+ high-intent target prompts, graded by funnel stage and business value — the coordinate system for the entire audit.
Gartner forecast: traditional search volume drops 25% by 2026 as queries shift to AI assistants
Services · BOFU Entry Product30 days to see where you
really stand in AI search
Your buyers are already asking ChatGPT “which one should I pick?” — do you know whether you're in the answer? A GEO Audit gives you a full read of your brand's visibility and citation gaps across six major AI engines in 30 days, and hands you a prioritized roadmap you can act on right away.
Fixed 30-day timeline · Named deliverables · A roadmap you can run yourself, no long-term lock-in
tenten-geo — audit-baseline (sample)
$ tenten geo audit --brand your-brand --day 30
✓ Prompt map of 1,000+ · six-engine scan complete
Engine Baseline cite Missing prompts
ChatGPT 12.4% 214
Perplexity 9.8% 236
AI Overviews 7.1% 257
Gemini 5.3% 268
Claude 4.6% 271
Copilot 3.9% 278
→ Gap matrix generated: 120 high-intent prompts with no matching content
* Figures shown are illustrative — your audit report reflects your actual scan results.
What you'll uncover
Three questions you can't answer today — but your buyers are already asking
This isn't a health check. It's an attack map: every finding maps straight to an action you can take.
01
Which high-intent prompts you're missing from
We build a map of 1,000+ target prompts and scan all six engines one by one to find every question where buyers ask “which one should I choose?” or “any recommendations?” and you're nowhere in the answer — then rank them by Pipeline value.
02
Why competitors get cited — and what sources they cite
We break down which competitor pages and which third-party sources the AI engines pull from — review sites, community threads, press coverage — and reconstruct the full path they took into the answer, so you know exactly what to copy and what to beat.
03
The gaps in your content and technical structure
Schema markup, entity consistency, llms.txt configuration, crawlability — we surface the structural issues that keep AI engines from “getting” you. For a lot of brands the content is fine; the problem is the AI simply can't read it correctly.
30-day timeline
Four weeks, from zero visibility data to an executable roadmap
Fixed timeline, fixed cadence, fixed deliverables — every week you know exactly what we're doing and what you'll get.
Six-engine scan and competitor citation analysis
We scan prompt by prompt across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude and Copilot, logging every citation and every source cited, to establish your visibility baseline against the competition.
Content gap matrix
We cross-reference the scan results against your existing content assets to produce a “prompt × content × citation status” matrix — flagging which pages just need a rewrite to make the answer, and which prompts need brand-new content.
Prioritized roadmap delivery session
A 90-minute delivery session: baseline report, gap matrix, and an action roadmap ranked by Pipeline impact. Specific down to the page level — your team can start the next morning.
What you get
Five named deliverables — not a single PDF you file and forget
Every deliverable is a working asset you'll keep using — long after the audit wraps, they stay your content team's day-to-day tools.
Deliverable 01Sample
Prompt map
1,000+ target prompts graded by buying intent, funnel stage and Pipeline value — the coordinate system for your GEO battlefield.
question-map.csv
“Best HR system for SMBs?” BOFU · P0
“What are the alternatives to {competitor}?” BOFU · P0
“How do you design a performance review process?” MOFU · P1
Deliverable 02Sample
AI visibility baseline report
Your citation rate and answer share across all six engines — the baseline every future iteration gets measured against.
visibility-baseline.pdf
ChatGPT 12.4% · Perplexity 9.8%
AI Overviews 7.1% · Gemini 5.3%
BOFU prompt answer share: 4.2%
Deliverable 03Sample
Competitor citation analysis
Who gets cited, from what sources, and why — the path competitors took into AI answers, plus where they're vulnerable.
competitor-citations.pdf
Competitor A ← G2 reviews + own comparison pages ×8
Competitor B ← third-party media reviews ×14
Your brand ← sources cited: 0 (gap)
Deliverable 04Sample
Content gap matrix
A “prompt × content asset × citation status” cross-matrix — see at a glance what to rewrite and what to build new.
content-gap-matrix.xlsx
120 high-intent prompts → no matching content
84% of existing content not citation-ready
37 pages → a rewrite gets you into the answer
Deliverable 05Sample
Prioritized roadmap
A page-level action list ranked by Pipeline impact — ready to execute, no second meeting required to decode it.
priority-roadmap.pdf
P0 ×12: BOFU comparison page rewrites (W1–W3)
P1 ×26: Schema and entity-consistency fixes
P2 ×41: MOFU new-content queue
* Figures in the samples (120 prompts, 84% not citation-ready, etc.) are illustrative; your real numbers come from your own scan.
Audit in practice · B2B SaaS · HR Tech
One audit, 200+ prompts they were missing from
This HR Tech team figured their “SEO was pretty solid.” The audit found otherwise: across 200+ high-intent prompts, AI answers left them out entirely — while a competitor owned the recommendation slot on the back of 14 third-party reviews. Six months into the roadmap, they'd become a fixture in ChatGPT and Perplexity answers for “HR system recommendations.”
Read the full case study →+312%
AI engine citations (6 months)
40+
Net-new inbound demos / month
200+
Missing prompts the audit uncovered
After the audit
Roadmap in hand — three paths, all open
The audit is a product that stands on its own, not bait for a contract. Once you have the roadmap, where you go next is your call.
01
Run it yourself
The roadmap is specific down to the page level and the order of priority, so your content and engineering teams can run it straight off the page — no renewal, no us in the room. That's a promise we can make because the audit pays for itself.
02
Enter the 90-day validation period
We run the roadmap and prove it out with weekly citation tracking: if citation rate and Pipeline metrics fall short of the forecast range, you can walk away any time. See the methodology first, then decide whether to hand us the execution.
Explore the 90-day validation methodology →03
Fire up the GEO content engine
Once validation clears, the roadmap feeds straight into the content engine: entity building, structured data, citable original data and points of view, iterating on a 3-week rewrite loop — turning the audit's findings into a predictable growth curve.
Explore the GEO content engine →FAQ
A few things worth settling before you decide
The diagnostic is a 30-minute snapshot: we scan your visibility across the six engines live and hand you the result on the spot — great for sizing up “how big the problem is.” The audit is a full 30-day project: a 1,000+ prompt map, competitor citation analysis, content gap matrix and prioritized roadmap — built for deciding “how to play.” We'd suggest booking the diagnostic first; see the snapshot, then decide whether the full audit makes sense.
A single query is just one sample: AI answers shift with phrasing, timing and user context, so what you see today may be gone tomorrow. The audit runs a systematic scan across 1,000+ prompts to establish a baseline you can compare against repeatably — the prerequisite for reading trends and quantifying results, which no manual one-off check can replace. Still nailing down the basics? Start with our explainer.
What is GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)? →About 3–4 hours total: one kickoff (to align on ICP, competitors and the direction of target prompts), read-only access to your site and analytics, and the 90-minute delivery session in W4. The scanning, analysis and documentation are all on us — it won't eat into your team's dev schedule.
No. The roadmap is specific down to the page and priority level, so your team can absolutely run it themselves — that's the whole premise of how it's designed. Most clients renew into the 90-day validation period because, after reading the baseline report, they want weekly citation tracking and dedicated execution — but that's a choice you make after seeing the data, not a contractual hook.
Compare it to building it yourself: to get a scan this deep, you'd need a content strategist plus an engineer spending months standing up a prompt library and tracking tools — the headcount alone runs well past what the audit costs, and it's outdated the moment it's done. Our pricing is fully transparent; the audit is the entry tier of a three-tier plan, so you can weigh it against the build-it-yourself cost and decide.
See transparent pricing →Not sure you need the full audit yet?
Settle it with a 30-minute diagnostic — we scan a live snapshot of your visibility across the six major AI engines and tell you on the spot how big the problem is and whether the full audit is worth it. Even if we don't work together, the snapshot is yours.
Nothing to prepare · Snapshot delivered on the spot · Fixed 30-day timeline