A single audit of the GEO should not be a full PDF, but a road map that you can start the next day. Tenten's 30-day GEO Audit cuts the time into four weeks: First look at AI, how to talk about you now, then crack the technology and content gap, and then give a list of actions that are prioritized. Here's a week-by-week description of what we're actually doing from day 1 to day 30, what you'll get at every node.
Why was it designed for 30 days instead of three months?
The answer to the AI engine changes almost every week. If the audit is delayed for two or three months, the visible baseline of the previous plate is long overdue by delivery and the conclusion lapses. 30 days long enough to run a full round of captures, content and quote analysis, and short enough to make baseline data credible. We deliberately put the rhythm on four weeks to get you a diagnosis and a response in the same market rather than an old report that needs to be retested.
Days 1 to 7: First look at AI, now what do you say?
First week without any page, just do one thing: record your current face in the AI engine. We use Brand Radar to write about your brand, product class and core purchases, and cross platforms like ChatGPT, Perpexity, Google AI Overviews, to record whether the frequency you were mentioned, the source address you cited, and the words you used in the model are correct. This week's production is a baseline line that can be followed back and then all changes are measured.
- Cross-platform visibility baseline: Your reference and source list for the main AI engine.
- Fact-correction check: Models describe what you say wrong or miss when you set, function, position.
- Competition: Which rivals have been cited more than you under the same buying problems, and from what source.
- Isitagentready Quick: Is the reptile able to read your main page?
Days 8 to 15: technical and accessible Nuclear
The second week of treatment is the easiest to ignore, but the most often to block the quote level: AI can read you or not. Many B2B sites have key content that has been rendered at the front end of JavaScript, and reptiles such as GPTBot, PerplexityBot have caught empty shells. We check page by page the robots.txt settings for AI reptiles, the original HTML content returned by the server, the integrity of the structure data, and whether the page host exists for the first time. Until the floor is repaired, the content will not be able to reach the model's chosen source.
- AI reptile access settings: robots.txt and server rules wrongly blocked GPTBot, Portability Bot, Google-Extended.
- Rendering check: Whether the core content is readable at the original HTML instead of relying on the client JavaScript.
- Structured data audit: coverage and correctness of the Organization, FAQPage, Article, etc.
- Referenceability: Whether the paragraph is self-contained, whether the title corresponds to the real question, whether the answer is clean or not.
16th to 23rd day: Content and reference gap analysis
Third week, focus on the content itself. We take a look at the pages where you have the opportunity to be quoted and the issues that you are completely absent from, and then look at the pages that are actually cited for the competition and find out what you are missing, what you are missing, what you are missing. The point is not to write more than a few articles, but to find out what you should have won but left to your opponent. This week's analysis will feed the last road map.
The value of the gap analysis is in the order. It's also "not quoted" and there's not a lot of questions for a year, and there's a lot of direct responses to your clients. We're buying each of these markers with intent and competition, so you know which one is the best to pay, instead of getting a list of to-dos that are not important.
24th to 30th Days: priority sequence route and delivery
Last week, the discovery of the previous three weeks was turned into an enforceable road map. Each question is marked by three things: impact (how much visibility can be recovered after repair), input (how much work to do), responsibility level (engineering, content or strategy). We'll take you through a delivery meeting to make sure your team knows what to start next Monday, not get the report in the folder.
- Technical amendment list: reptiles, rendering and schema in order of impact, with specific modifications.
- Content Action List: The new or rewrited page, the respective target questions and opportunities for reference.
- 30/60/90 Day Run: Which is done this month and which is scheduled for the next season.
- Measurement: Which indicators, how often are they recalculated, and whether the modification has raised the reference.
What exactly does NT$39000 contain?
We set the price and the range because the GEO is the best place to get a vague offer. The fee covers the full 30-day process and total delivery: Brand Radar cross-platform visualization baseline report, technical and accessible audit, content and reference gap analysis, prioritized routing, and a delivery meeting with you to finish the report. It is a one-time diagnostic project that does not bind the contract; it will be extended to the content engine or the AI Agent strategy, if the road map is really made later.
If you're not sure if you're right, wrong or not mentioned in the AI engine, 30 days in the first week will give you the answer. If you want to talk about where your gap is worth doing, you can have a 30-minute GEO diagnosis, and we'll show you where your real brand is going.
